Inserted by Admin:
Because this topical thread progressed through several responses before Admin had a chance to reply, to make our reply helpfully effective for our Open Forum’s readers, Admin will insert appropriate responses (in red italicized text—like this comment) directly into the topical thread’s posts, down to our first response made directly as a post from Admin below; respectively, we hope these comments are helpful to you all. And now, here is Weasel's post with Admin's inserts in red:
I started this week with one objective—Prepare myself for a visit from the dept of agriculture regarding the census form they sent me to fill out that was due Feb 4th. Well I don't farm, never have, and I don’t like prying questions. So I wanted to get my ducks in a row so I could politely tell the enumerator that I would not be participating in their census. They state that it is the "law" and has to be filled out. I thought I would go on line and see if that were true, and see what others might have done under the same circumstances.
You might want to use this forum’s search function and search on “Census” for more information regarding others inquiries about that topic.
As I understand it the law they imply is a federal code and refers to the population census which I did. As far as I'm concerned there will be no cooperation on my part. But you might ask why am I posting this? It is because before this week I had never heard of " Corp U.S" or a land patent. I have read land 101 and listened to the audio ect.. I'm in my fifties and this is all new to me and has been very unsettling. I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer and it takes awhile for things to sink in at times. If what you say on your site is true and you're not just another charlatan looking for a buck then I am the product of a dumbed- down corp educational system. Could it be that I have grown accustom (been trained) to having the corners of my sovereign liberty clipped?
Regarding that term: “Sovereignty”, you might want to learn what we have already published to help people learn both what it is and why it is so important. Respectively, we suggest that you might want to start with Myth 6 from our Patriot Mythology page (to dispel a myth promoted by the so called “Patriot Movement” and then from that article (Myth 6) click on the word Sovereignty, anywhere you see it highlighted in blue.
I now owe it to myself and to my family to find out. I have no mortgage, my home is on 120 acres that I own, or at least I think I do.
It is good that you have learned enough to question that matter (your landownership), even before you came to Team Law; however, before you take any action regarding that matter, be wise enough to make sure you learn the truth about what steps you need to take to resolve the ownership so that, in the end, if you were not already the landowner, you are when you complete your work to secure your landownership. Again, to help you understand who else might be the owner you may want to review the following articles: Contracts, Trusts and the Corporation Sole and Myth 22 (making sure that you at least complete your study through the seven elements of Prerequisite Knowledge found within Myth 22).
I pulled out my abstract and looked at the first entry. Then I went to the BLM web site to see if I could find my name listed on the land and it wasn't there. Then the light came on and I saw that all the dates were mid 1800's and then I looked for the name listed on the abstract and bingo! it was there. The guy was granted the land patent for his military service with the Virginia militia, war of 1812. So without belaboring the story any further. This is the question that comes to mind:
- You use terms that I'm trying to put a value on such as "secure your acceptance of the Land Patent". It would seem as though your updating the land patent to the current holder? Can you elaborate?
- Does anyone post their land patent successes and how it has helped them?
We expect that the “information overload” is actually caused by both the fact that you discovered the rat hole by happenstance and that your research into the truth did not start with a solid foundation. Respectively, if you will follow the suggested reading path we provided above, that will start to build such a solid foundation—of course, that should remove the feeling of overload; even though the volume of information that may seem new to you now should become quite easy to learn and apply because, though you will discover the history you once thought you knew was off a bit, what you learn along the journey will have a solid foundation that you can easily learn firsthand from your own study of the law itself. Thus, you will no longer have to rely on anyone else for knowing whether something is true or correct. You will know it because you will have the proof that you yourself compiled in a relatively short time from your own experience.
Now, we will leave our response to your first question to the topical thread that follows; however, to answer you second question we would first have to understand what you mean by: “land patent success.” Quite frankly, we do not understand that term because land patent’s are not something upon which success can exist in and of itself; therefore, to answer such a question we would first have to know what success you were referring to as it related to the land patent. We expect that what follows in this topical thread will shed more light on what a land patent is (though we have repeatedly covered that topic elsewhere); for now we will simply repeat the fact that a land patent is the actual “Title” to the land in question; and, so note, that the land patent’s (Title’s) existence is its own success—because, it existence (as a sure matter of record) makes it the “Law of the Land”.