:h: Welcome
to Team Law’s Forum!

We hold a Free Conference Call every: Monday, Wednesday & Friday morning from:
8:00 – 9:00 AM (Mountain Time).

Call: (857) 232-0158; use the Conference Access Code: 110045.

Join us on, and invite your friends to, our next Conference Call!

Use this Forum to contact Team Law;
use this link for more: contact information.

We hope this information is helpful to you.
Tell everybody about Team Law! :t^:

After reading this announcement, you may remove it by clicking the “X” in the upper right corner of the announcement's green background.

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Learn how to:
Compel Congress to return to Honor with the Constitution!

Bigdog
Registered
Posts: 4
Joined: Sunday March 19th, 2006 4:54 pm MST

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Bigdog » Friday December 28th, 2012 8:36 pm MST

:h: Inserted by Admin:
Due to the importance of the “Call to Action” that page is locked from direct replies; and this topical thread was created for supportive Comments and inquiries. Accordingly, we inserted this comment directly into this post to introduce this topical thread and to remind everyone that on this forum red colored text is reserved to Admin (see: Rule 22).

Respectively, this topical thread is reserved for positive supportive Comments and inquiries only. Please do not try to use this space to voice opposing opinions to this action (for all such will be deleted). That is our hope because such comments have nothing to do with our support of this action.

Team Law supports Zane’s action because it is the right thing to do in accord with the law.

With that we open this page for supportive comments on the “Call to Action” with the post that originally occupied this space:

Bigdog’s inquiry:
Just opened the 12/28/12 post regarding the “Call to Action”; is this for real? Zane Grey? a western fiction writer who passed on who's real name was Pearl or is this someone alive now? give us the info. do you have an up-date?
Admin’s response:
Yes, this is real! Zane Grey is a living man and he would like us to give him all of the support we can generate both by passing on links to this “Call to Action” and by sending letters (like the samples provided) to the Attorney General as well as to all of the members of Congress from each State.
:t^:

Acer
Registered
Posts: 1
Joined: Friday March 25th, 2011 10:31 am MDT

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Acer » Friday December 28th, 2012 10:15 pm MST

Yeah, I'm sure we'll all be thrilled to have Romney as our de facto president.

:h: Inserted by Admin:
This is not a case regarding who anyone wants or doesn’t want for President; rather, it is a simple matter of law. According to the United States Constitution, Barrack Obama simply does not qualify for the office. That is it. Of course, if by his removal all that happens is “Obamacare” is eliminated, we will all be better off for it. But still, that is not the point. The point is, Obama does not qualify for the office and it is the responsibility of the people to learn and apply the law—in this case, the United States Constitution. That is why Zane filed this action. Respectively, he needs all of the support he can get and that is why Team Law is supporting him. When Obama was elected the first time around and all of the hoopla was raised about where he was born, we published an acknowledgment of the lawful process for making such a challenge—which was (and remains) Quo Warranto. The proper time for bringing such an action is between the popular election and the seating of a President Elect that does not qualify for the office. So, though that was not done then (in 2008), that is why Zane brought his action now. And, because the time allotted for such a challenge is short, he needs all of the support he can get; from all of those willing to take action. Respectively, the action to take is:
  1. Spread the word, send everyone you can to the “Call to Action” page;
  2. Send letters to members of Congress (like those provided on the “Call to Action” page); and,
  3. Send letters to the Attorney General (like those provided on the “Call to Action” page.
Respectively, if you are willing to participate with that process, great, we appreciate your support; if not, we appreciate the fact that you have the right to your opinion and (like the rest of us) the responsibility of living with your results. As for us, we think it is important to do all we can to exercise our rights and apply them; for if we don’t it is almost a certainty that the opportunity to exercise them will be lost.
:t^:

Zzwaggy
Registered
Posts: 1
Joined: Friday April 29th, 2011 10:11 am MDT

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Zzwaggy » Saturday December 29th, 2012 7:55 am MST

I'm glad to see there are steps we the people are taking to take back the USA… the concern I have with the birth certificate is this tactic has been challenged before and we got nowhere with it.
:h: Inserted by Admin:
Actually, this “tactic” has never been raised either in a timely manner or for this cause. If you will read the Notice and Demand that was served on the Attorney General, you will see that the Office in challenge is “President Elect”; that is to say, Barrack Obama’s candidacy for that Office is being challenged via Quo Warranto; which means, to prevail in that challenge Obama will have to prove that his father was a United States citizen at the time of his birth. Not only has no such issue ever been timely brought, but, the evidence Obama already posted on the White House website proves exactly the opposite of what he needs to show to prevail.

Respectively, the only way to go nowhere with this issue is to sit around discussing the merits of such an action without doing anything to support the cause that is already on its way.

Thus, this is not a time for discussions. This action was already initiated by Zane. Respectively, the only thing anyone else needs to do is spread the word to everyone and inspire them to do three things:
  1. Tell everyone you can about this suit and inspire them to do the same thing—use every resource to sent people to “Call to Action”;
  2. Send physical letters and e-mail messages to all of the members of both houses of Congress (see the “Call to Action” for both sample letters and addresses to the members of Congress); and,
  3. Send physical letters and e-mail messages to the Attorney General (see the “Call to Action” for both sample letters and the Attorney General’s address).
That is all we are asking anyone to do!

Respectively, you have the choice to:
  1. Do nothing—in which case you will have the reasonable expectation that nothing will happen; or,
  2. You can act now and do your part by sending this “Call to Action” address (“http://teamlawforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1135”) everywhere and inspiring everyone you can to do the same. :t^:

Rickoff
Registered
Posts: 4
Joined: Wednesday June 15th, 2011 3:21 pm MDT

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Rickoff » Saturday December 29th, 2012 10:49 am MST


:h: Inserted by Admin:
Due to the length of this post instead of reserving our comments for the end of the post Admin will insert our comments, with red italicized text, throughout this inquiry as follows
:t^:
I too am wondering if this "Call to Action" is based on reality, or even realistic thinking. The name Zane Grey could be a real name of a real living person, but conjures up the thought of a pen name, and also the name of a traditional song about an old horse who is on his last legs, so to speak.
Rest assured Zane is a real man and this is a real action; quite frankly, our 18+ years of service and the honor we have established in that time should preclude any such misgivings.
I fully agree with Zzwaggy, a quo warranto suit was already filed against Barry by Orly Taitz in January of 2010, and was dismissed by U.S. District Court Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth as being frivoulous. Lamberth said, "The Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her."
Given the fact that Orly Taitz is a foreign born attorney and the fact that the action she brought was neither timely nor properly filed, one must wonder whether she was working for Obama to create a smoke screen that would make it appear like such an action could not work. Indeed, her action was frivolous and it is no wonder that the court threw it out. Of course, that says nothing about a properly filed case that is timely filed in the right court; nor does it speak to the effect of what the United States Senate’s reaction will be when millions of people start hounding them to properly vet the matter as they are required to do in confirming such elections; which is an elemental part of the sample letter to members of Congress provided on the “Call to Action” page. When properly brought the court does not have the capacity to throw out the action. Given that no Quo Warranto action has yet been brought in a timely manner regarding the issues at hand; and, given the fact that this action is not going against a President that has the power to pardon, rather it is going against a “President Elect” that cannot qualify as a candidate for the Office. This is a proper application of the lawfully unstoppable (when properly applied) 9th amendment secured right to Quo Warranto.
There have literally been dozens of legal proceedings against Barry, all of which have been swept aside by the courts with the evidence never being allowed to go forward. All such cases were ruled as either being frivolous, or that the plaintiff or plaintiffs had no legal standing to bring the case in the first place. In all cases that were appealed to a higher court, the higher courts ruled not to overturn the lower court ruling, or to even hear the case. This includes at least two appeals that reached the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS).
Again, we have reviewed virtually all such cases and generally we have to agree with the courts; in every case we reviewed we found they were: not timely brought, brought within an improper venue or brought by a party that was without standing. For the most part, the only style of action under which the proper contest could be made so to challenge the President would have to be either:
  1. A Quo Warranto action; or,
  2. A Senate impeachment proceeding.
Yet, for a Quo Warranto action to properly work it would have to be properly filed in a proper venue at the proper time; and, that time is now—after a popular election (when the candidate is elected into the Office of President Elect) and before the “President Elect” is seated in the office of President of the United States. All of that Zane has done, in a timely manner—thus, his action is the first that has properly qualified for the issuance of a Quo Warranto Writ

In one case which was placed before the SCOTUS for consideration, the case was presented on behalf of Alan Keyes, who ran for President in 2008. He contested Obama's name being placed on the California ballot without Obama having shown any proof that he was eligible, and asked for a subpoena to be granted which would have demanded that Obama produce eligibility records. The California Superior Court ruled that Keyes was not entitled to the proof he sought, and a California Appeals Court affirmed that decision in October of 2010. In 2011, the California Supreme Court declined, without any comment, to further review the case. When the case was then appealed to the SCOTUS for review in October of 2011, the SCOTUS declined, without comment, to hear the case.
Again, wrong cause of action (an action filed to bar Obama from the ballot, alleging that he was not born in the United States), filed in the wrong court (a California State court), and untimely filed. Of course that can all be confirmed because those are the exact reasons the case was thrown out.
Therefore, the idea that Mitt Romney could somehow succeed in forcing a showdown on this issue has no merit.
On the contrary, the mere fact that Mitt Romney got more popular votes than Obama but was just short on Corp. U.S.’ version of electoral votes means that if Obama does not lawfully qualify for the Office of President Elect (candidate for President of the United States), then Romney won the election hands down; therefore, Romney has standing to bring a Quo Warranto case directly iaw the law. Look, this is not rocket science; it is the simplest basic elements of the god given inherent right to Quo Warranto (ask “by what authority”). There is no doubt in law whether Romney has the right to bring the action. However, it is all too likely that (like most people—even those with law degrees) he does not know about his right to the Quo Warranto action. Respectively, the people should awaken him to the fact that he has their support in filing such an action.
Besides, even if that were not so, Romney is an establishment politician who would pursue and further the same agenda of the Ruling Class elite which Barry, as Corporation U.S. puppet president now supports. Nothing would change for the better with Romney in office.
Lucky for us, though that is not the issue here, two things would dramatically change with Romney in office:
  1. Obama care would be gone.
  2. Medicare would be restored.
Now, that might not seem like much to some people; but, if you are 75 years old and thus recognized as having already lived a full life so the medical community has you on the termination list, that certainly makes a difference. We have seen several people that were actually told by the doctors that exact thing and they started giving them drugs that would kill them. Also, businesses all over the place are quitting (like Hostess) or they have already cut hours or fired their full time employees, just to circumvent “Obamacare”. That is a substantial difference. Also, if you don’t go by the media hype and instead, look at the man’s actual record, he left a fairly impressive track record for someone that worked his way through the Corp. U.S. system.

In another case to have actually gone as far as the US Supreme Court (Donofrio vs Wells, 2008) the case was referred to the Supreme Court by SCOTUS justice Clarence Thomas, but the Court voted to decline hearing the case and did so without making any comment. This case was by far the most important case concerning Presidential ineligibility, because it not only concerned Barry's ineligibility, but also the ineligibility of John McCain (born in the Panama canal zone) as well as the Socialist Worker's Party Candidate, Roger Calero, who held Nicaraguan citizenship.
Again, wrong venue, wrong issue and improper timing; Though this case did address the fact that Obama’s father was not a citizen, the issue before the court was not Obama’s candidacy; it was a ballot issue raised in a State court. Thus, given that the proper cause of action to hear that candidacy issue is Quo Warranto and the proper time for it is between election into the office of President Elect (Quo Warranto addresses authority to act in an office, if the candidate has not been elected there is no unlawful act); thus, though there was a cert. to the Supreme Court, there was no cause for them to review the lower court’s decision; thus, Cert. denied. The bottom line, you can go to Wikipedia’s list of actions against Obama and review the list, in none of them do you find a single properly filed Quo Warranto action. If you did it would have been filed in the Federal courts and the caption would have either been United States vs Obama or in place of “United States” there would have been the name of a candidate that was beat in the popular election (like Mitt Romney). Barring that party will lack standing or the subject matter will not be properly set; then there is the issue of timing; and, that requires that the election must have been held and the President Elect has not yet been seated as President. If you want to otherwise challenge a seated President, according to the Constitution, that has to be done through the Senate and their impeachment process. Do it wrong and the case simply dies on its way in.
Whatever became of the effort to install original jurisdiction governors in the 48 o.j. states? Has that not yet succeeded? And even if not fully successful, aren't there enough states which do have an o.j. governor in place to carry the plan forward?
Though that has nothing to do with either this topical thread or with Corp. U.S., that process is still proceeding and you can always track that on our Governor’s Corner page. Respectively, we always need people actively spreading the word about the original jurisdiction elections; and we will continue to support that work until it is completed.
That seemed to be a much better plan than this "Call to Action."
Again, this “Call to Action” has nothing to do with the original jurisdiction elections. Respectively, we do not understand why anyone would imagine that we might stop supporting the original jurisdiction elections (18 years worth of work) just because we support a man’s “Call to Action” when he actually studied the law well enough to understand how to apply it through the process of Quo Warranto. No, though we support Zane’s “Call to Action”, that changes none of our other work or our continued support of people learning how to learn the law.

In fact, Zane’s action is his alone unless other join with him. Nonetheless, he needs the support of the people in succeeding with this action. That is exactly why we posted his “Call to Action”. Respectively, though we hope most people that discover this “Call to Action” do like SimplyThinkDreams did and simply take the action because they have nothing to loose and everything to gain.

Now is not the time to talk and ponder such a matter. Instead, you need to notice that this is your chance to be a part of something that will truly make a difference! Respectively, the appropriate response to the “Call to Action” is:
  1. Spread the word, send everyone you can to the “Call to Action” page;
  2. Send letters to members of Congress (like those provided on the “Call to Action” page); and,
  3. Send letters to the Attorney General (like those provided on the “Call to Action” page.
It is just that simple. Stop wondering what can be done and take action! :t^:

GSICBZ
Registered
Posts: 1
Joined: Sunday March 20th, 2011 11:55 am MDT

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby GSICBZ » Saturday December 29th, 2012 1:05 pm MST


:h: Inserted by Admin:
Before this post was posted there were a few posts that had been posted with either a negative (unsupportive) nature or that were off-point; however, because those posts failed to follow our Forum Rules they were removedto our private message area where they were politely responded to by Admin.

I've never before posted on this forum.
It is imperative you people stop with the negativity and just take the extra time to follow the suit. Everyone that thinks doing a little something is a waste of time that it won't make a difference…that is what the Corp. U.S. hopes you will do. One man…can…put them in their place…by…fighting back and I have seen results…. I never thought I could put judges, attorneys, court clerks in their place but I have!!! They fear my presence because I have gone after them and not sat back and take the fraud. Action is the only way!!! I have been doing it also and I assure you things are changing!!!
Since this post was made we have had some private inquiries regarding such actions where people have been asking if they can bring their own Quo Warranto action from their State/location; and the answer is: “Yes—absolutely! Again, the right of Quo Warranto (to ask ‘By what authority’) is one of the original rights of man secured to the people by the 9th amendment; thus, anyone can bring such an action.” Though, it would be best if you make sure you understand the process before you bring the action. In fact, filing a letter with the Attorney General (like Zane did) does not obligate you to proceed foreward; it only preserves your right ot do so. Thus, if millions of people sent letters exactly like the one Zane already filed, that would only make it clear that the people want the Attorney General to proceed foreward with the Quo Warranto action. Rest assured, even if he does not, we expect Zane will proceed with the action into court. :t^:

User avatar
SimplyThinkDreams
Beneficiary
Beneficiary
Posts: 110
Joined: Thursday February 5th, 2009 4:45 pm MST

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby SimplyThinkDreams » Saturday December 29th, 2012 1:51 pm MST

Hey everyone,
I see there has been a lot of posting going on in this thread. Just a friendly reminder, Team Law does have a set of rules to abide by when posting on this forum; so, please read the Forum Rules.

Due to the number of posts and the length of each one, I cannot reply to everyone. I wanted to post here to address a couple of concerns. The first one is whether or not the Notice and Demand to Secure a Writ of Quo Warranto is real. The answer is yes, this is for real and your timely action would greatly help in the endeavor to apply the Quo Warranto case against Barack Obama’s capacity to serve as President Elect candidate for President of the United States (Corp. U.S.).

Another concern was whether or not Zane Grey is a real person. Yes, Zane Grey is a real person in Pennsylvania. He also needs your help; so, please write your Congressmen and the Attorney General as soon as possible.

I sent my letters out via the mail and got my father to do the same. I also e-mailed each of the Congressmen just in case they get the e-mail faster than the written letters.

This matter is of utmost importance and you should not hesitate or delay; rather, take action immediately! The more people pressing Congress and the Attorney General regarding this matter, the better.

User avatar
Zane
Beneficiary
Beneficiary
Posts: 74
Joined: Wednesday February 4th, 2009 5:29 pm MST

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Zane » Sunday December 30th, 2012 4:58 pm MST

Hello everyone,
My name is ,Zane Grey, and the last time I checked I am a real flesh and blood, living man (I pinched my cheek). I am 45 years old, I live in Pennsylvania and I very much want your support in this action. My father is a huge western fan, that should explain the name. I have read all the books.

Ask yourself one question- Do you really want a man in the seat of the President who isn't even a citizen of the United States let alone a natural born citizen. He is merely a resident who has lied to and betrayed the American people and the trust we put into the offices of government. Let's not even get into the destruction he has caused to the financial stability of our nation.

It is our duty to bring this action!

You might be thinking that a nobody from nowhere, like me, isn't going to make a bit of difference. I have one thing to say to you... " Watch it happen!"

I know you all are as much concerned about the fact that Obama isn't qualified to be President as I am and, that it is embarrassing to us that he managed to lie his way in there the first time so, are you going to do the simple task of sending those letters and emails to your reps and the AG, which Team Law so graciously posted in support of this action; or, are you going to be one of those who stands around while everyone else does the work?

Now is the time and there are 3 weeks left before an imposter takes the seat of President...again. I, for one, refuse to stand around and just let that happen and, I know you aren't going to either because, that's not the way the American People are!

Let's do this thing!
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." (Hosea 4:6)

Jacks
Beneficiary
Beneficiary
Posts: 4
Joined: Friday August 12th, 2005 5:37 pm MDT

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Jacks » Thursday January 10th, 2013 5:40 pm MST

I have followed the actions listed in the "Call to Action", including sharing the information with my contacts. I have also written followups to the Mississippi congressmen, again requesting their support for Zane's Quo Warranto action, for them to start impeachment hearings, and for them to bring a Quo Warranto action themselves.

I understand that Mitt Romney is the best one to bring a Quo Warranto action before the Senate, but can any Senator bring it?

Is there specific action I can request from my Senators to compel Attorney General Holder to prosecute or release Zane to prosecute for him?

Can any Senator get this action heard in the Senate if they bring a Quo Warranto themselves, or only Mitt Romney?

User avatar
Zane
Beneficiary
Beneficiary
Posts: 74
Joined: Wednesday February 4th, 2009 5:29 pm MST

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Zane » Friday January 11th, 2013 7:23 am MST

Jacks,
Your support is very much appreciated, thank you very much. :ro

Mitt Romney is the best person to bring a Quo Warranto action because he was the candidate that was actually elected President, given the fact that Obama does not qualify as a candidate for the office; therefore, because Mitt Romney has a vested interest in the Office (he even won the popular vote), he can bring a Quo Warranto action in his own name contesting the legality of Obama’s alleged election as President Elect.

However, the Senate could simply impeach Obama to consider the matter themselves; and, any Senator could institute such an action in the Senate.

I have the return receipt from Eric Holder’s (Attorney General) office proving service upon him of the Notice and Demand I sent; Therefore, he knew or should have known about the timely Quo Warranto action request. Other than someone with a personal interest in the office (like Mitt Romney), the Attorney General is the one with the authority to bring the Quo Warranto action to the Supreme Court without first having to go through a lower Court. Or, if he declines to prosecute, I would be empowered with the authority to bring the action asan independant prosecutor for the Attorney General’s office. It is not likely that Eric Holder will prosecute or even respond to my letter giving me authority because, when Obama (his boss) is removed from office the new President would appoint his own Attorney General and that would end Eric Holder’s career inthat office. Thus, I expect he'll drag his feet till the 20th when they are more safe (if he acknowledges the request at all.

There is no statute of limitations on Quo Warranto, it is a remedy as long as the usurpation exists. Once the action is filed Obama has 3-20 days to appear in Court and prove eligibility, which is impossible for him to do, depending on the distance from him to the Court. Of course, during the time he is the President Elect is the best time for this action and it is the only action and remedy that is proper for this particular scenario.

There's still one week left to get this action before the court; respectively, we need all the support we can get.

Zane.

I am not aware of anything I can do to compel Holder to prosecute or respond to me in writing of his refusal to prosecute besides rallying the people in great masses to this effort which would make it impossible for him to ignore this issue any longer.
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." (Hosea 4:6)

Jacks
Beneficiary
Beneficiary
Posts: 4
Joined: Friday August 12th, 2005 5:37 pm MDT

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Jacks » Friday January 11th, 2013 4:08 pm MST

Zane,
As I called to discuss your Quo Warranto action with the local and Washington, DC offices of Senator Wicker (Mississippi), I learned that there is a 3 week delay in hard copy letters getting through the security screening process before they get to the Senator's office. The Attorney General's office may be the same.

However, they already had access to the email letters I had sent only 2 days ago, and pulled them from the inbox to send it to the staffer responsible for review of legal matters when I called. They also listened to my concerns and forwarded a record of our conversation. I included the link to your Quo Warranto Notice from the Team Law "Call to Action" page and requested that they review your action and expedite their own impeachment proceedings to get the question of Mr. Obama's natural born citizen status answered once and for all before the seating of the next President. I emphasized to them that "natural born citizen" has a legal requirement of both parents being citizens when one is born, as this is a surprise to most people that I talk to (as it was to me).

I am encouraging everyone to send Congress email messages and follow-up phone calls to the Senate local and D.C. offices to be sure they are seeing the information sent.

Thank you for pressing through!
Jacks

User avatar
Zane
Beneficiary
Beneficiary
Posts: 74
Joined: Wednesday February 4th, 2009 5:29 pm MST

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Zane » Saturday January 12th, 2013 7:39 am MST

Jacks,
Great job!

From the 20th on, people should continue to alert their Senators and Representatives through the Call to Action and emails to continue pressing them on this issue which may indeed get the Senate to bring impeachment proceedings if enough of the people get involved.

Zane.
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." (Hosea 4:6)

User avatar
Admin
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1574
Joined: Thursday June 9th, 2005 12:16 pm MDT

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Admin » Saturday January 12th, 2013 4:50 pm MST

:h: Zane & Jacks:
For those that have not yet done their own study to learn what the Quo Warranto action is or how it works, we suggest that you go to Team Law’s Home Page and click on the blue words, “Quo Warranto”, in the first paragraph, that will open up for you a short report regarding Quo Warranto actions. In that report your will see that Quo Warranto is a 9th Amendment reserved remedial right of the people. Quo Warranto is used to remedy three fatal errors anyone holding any office may have made; respectively, Quo Warranto can be used to ask any of the following three questions:
  1. Was the office acquired lawfully?
  2. Did the officer do anything he/she was forbidden from doing in that office?
  3. Did the officer fail to do anything that was lawfully required of the office?
If the answer to any of those questions is, “Yes”, Quo Warranto applies and the court is required to issue a Writ removing the officer from the office.

Now, given that fact, let’s again look at the Constitution’s requirement regarding Congress’ obligation to review Presidential elections:
At Article 2 § 1 Clause 3, the Founders wrote:The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice President.
Now a portion of that Article was amended as follows:
At, Article 12, We wrote:The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate; -- the President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; -- The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. [And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President. --]* The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.
We must pay particular attention to the last sentence of that amendment and notice that Congress is required to vet eligibility of Presidential candidates when they review the outcome of the Electoral College’s election; and, that requirement is explicitly restricts candidates to qualified candidates as follows:
At, Article 2 § 1 Clause 5, the Founders wrote:No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
Accordingly, if any member of Congress participates in that process and has been made aware that any candidate does not so qualify, then, they have failed to do that which they were required to do. Of course, at that point the ignorant masses cry, “But what are we to do when the officers of government will not follow the law?”

Again, the rightful remedy to that failure is on of the key elements of: “Quo Warranto.”

Respectively, when Congress vets an election in accord with Article 2 § 1 Clause 3 (as they were supposed to do on January 4, 2013), they are required to do so under the control of Article 2 § 1 Clause 5; thus, if any member of Congress participates in that vetting process and is aware that a candidate so elected does not qualify for the Office of President, they are required to make that known to the body of Congress; and, if they fail to do so they instantly become subject to the people’s cause of Quo Warranto.

Though we did not here copy the requirements of law regarding impersonation of an federal government official—which is a felony—failure to properly report that crime can make the party so aware a party to the felony and equally liable.
Respectively, at Article 1 § 3 clauses 6-7, the Founders wrote:The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
Wherefore, even after a Presidential Election the Senate remains required to raise such issues as an unqualified candidate that was mis-elected and seated into that office.

The bottom line, given the fact that many people called, sent e-mail and letters to members of Congress and to the Attorney General they must have been aware of the matter; which means that they are all now liable to Quo Warranto actions that can be brought against each of them.

In the interim the 20thArticle of amendment addresses what happens in Corp. U.S. when no one can be lawfully seated by January 20th as follows:
At Article 20, § 3. We wrote:If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.
Respectively, it seems a reasonable thing now for the people to start bringing Quo Warranto actions against each and every member of Congress. After all, this is the most powerful authority the people retain to secure remedy against such an issue.

We hope this information is helpful to you.
Tell everybody about Team Law! :t^:
Team Law,

"In memory of our God, our faith, and freedom,
and of our spouses, our children, and our peace.
"


As with all Forum posts, comments made by Admin are:
copyrighted—all rights reserved; and, provided here for educational purposes only.

Jacks
Beneficiary
Beneficiary
Posts: 4
Joined: Friday August 12th, 2005 5:37 pm MDT

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Jacks » Sunday January 13th, 2013 3:56 pm MST

Thank you Admin for your extensive post. I had been pondering, and it seems that the Quo Warranto action, rather than a mandamus to compel his action, is also the appropriate action against A.G. Holder if he does not follow through or release Zane to prosecute. Perhaps the United States attorney is the one to receive a Quo Warranto against A.G. Holder if he refuses to act, as he (as well as the A.G) is authorized to bring the Quo Warranto action directly in DC?

Regarding Quo Warranto action against the Senators, is A.G. Holder the correct one to receive such Notice of Quo Warranto? I have not been able to confirm whether A.G.Holder and the United States attorney are the ones who can also independently bring a Quo Warranto action against U.S. Senators (and Representatives?) who have failed to do their duty to verify eligibility of the President Elect candidate, or whether it would may be the State Attorney General of each state.

As I carry the process through in my mind to a possible long delay in seating the President, I am concerned that getting the conservative Mississippi Senator and other conservatives removed by Quo Warranto action could leave the Senate liberals to sign off on U.N. treaties unrestrained by the need for a super majority (which they do not now have), especially since it appears Joe Biden could be the qualified acting President during any delay in seating the Office of President. Actually it seems Biden should warrant a Quo Warranto against him as Vice President, or some other legal action, for being complicit in promoting and running with an unlawful candidate. Would this or some other action be appropriate for Biden's complicity?

Thank you!

User avatar
Zane
Beneficiary
Beneficiary
Posts: 74
Joined: Wednesday February 4th, 2009 5:29 pm MST

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Zane » Sunday January 13th, 2013 7:01 pm MST

Jacks,
By now, all of Congress, the Attorney General and the President Elect are aware of this action and not one has stepped forward to comply with the law. They are all ripe for a Quo Warranto action at this point. After the 20th they are safe from this particular action but, not from each and every member of Congress being subject to the Quo Warranto for failure to do what is required of them.

It would take masses from every State to compel the Senate to impeach. We need to put together a form letter like the one for my action that every one can use after the 20th to continue with the pressure on Corp US to remove Obama immediately.

Removing Obama would end Obamacare and the upcoming destruction of what's left of the economy, dignity, peace and liberty of this nation.
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." (Hosea 4:6)

User avatar
Admin
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1574
Joined: Thursday June 9th, 2005 12:16 pm MDT

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Admin » Monday January 14th, 2013 1:39 pm MST

:h: Jacks:
As noted before, the Attorney General (hereinafter “AG”) has the privilege of determining not to prosecute a Quo Warranto action; however, he must give notice that he has determined not to so prosecute. Thus, the AG is not subject to Quo Warranto for failing to bring such an action.

We do not believe that Biden can qualify for the office given that he has served with Obama as an impersonator and is just as guilty as Obama for the felony of impersonation of a federal officer. However, that is again a felony related to how the Vice President obtained the office.

The beauty of Quo Warranto actions regarding the members of Congress that failed to do what they were required to do is that such actions are brought in the Federal District courts in accord with the Quo Warranto procedures as specified in State law; thus, the AG does not have the protection of the D.C. Code regarding Quo Warranto; therefore, other than timely choosing whether he will bring the action, he must quickly give notice of that decision or the action can proceed in accord with his tacit admission that he has chosen not to so proceed.

Again, the most important thing is the people must begin to study the Quo Warranto right thoroughly so they can timely and lawfully apply it. Also, again, these actions need the support of the people in mass. Thus, it is critical that the people continue to support the process all over the nation, in every federal judicial district.

The bottom line: the Constitution only works when the people learn how to apply it compellingly upon the government.

Thus, as in the time of Moses when the people had all bee bitten by the poisonous snakes and were dying from those bites. Moses gave them a choice:
  1. They could either look at the snake he fashioned on his staff—and live—all that looked, lived; or,
  2. They could believe it would not work and prove that it would not by refusing to so look—and die—all that refused to so look died.
In this case, all of those that learn how to lawfully apply the Quo Warranto action and so proceed forward can help save our nation; and, respectively, those that do not believe can refuse to take part in the movement; however, in this case, if the people fail to learn and apply the law, throughout the land, the people could remain in their ignorance and be compelled into civil war.

Our hope is that the people will realize that regardless of Corp. U.S’. intent to foment civil war, the people have the power to avoid such a confrontation by learning the law and applying it in mass in the courts and continuing forward with such actions, in mass, until the matter is lawfully resolved.

We must always remember, war takes at least two sides willing to fight. And, to preserve our nation, our liberty and peace we must reserve ourselves to the battlefield of lawfully applying our laws!

It is imperative that we all return to and follow our Creator’s way of life with honor. By honoring His laws and way of life we retain His promise that He will fight our battles for us; which does not mean that we can bury our heads—as a righteous people, we have to learn and apply the law for it to be effective. God helps those that follow His law and apply the law; even as it is our right and responsibility so to do.

Thus, if we came to this point in ignorance, having failed to learn and apply the law and thus are reaping the reward of that slothful error; now is the time to repent and honor that responsibility to learn and apply the law.

Again, the bottom line: the Constitution only works when the people learn it and apply it; respectively, Team Law can help anyone learn how to learn it; so, they can legally and lawfully apply it. Failing to do so only makes us worthy of the consequences—in fact, it should be obvious, that is why our nation is in the situation we find ourselves in today.

It s time for a fundamental change; however, the change required is not our Constitutional Republic form of government; rather, it is that We, the People, need to learn how the laws of our Constitutional Republic are applied by us to preserve our form of government. We must learn that we can only preserve our nation, our liberty and our peace by learning and peacefully applying the law (in accord with God’s Law). No other solution will keep food on the table, fuel in the tanks and warmth in our homes.

Respectively, we continue to call the people to action—and that means that we also need to continue to spread the word—get others involved, nominate your friends, neighbors and associates; and, help us spread the word.

We hope this information is helpful to you.
Tell everybody about Team Law! :t^:
Team Law,

"In memory of our God, our faith, and freedom,
and of our spouses, our children, and our peace.
"


As with all Forum posts, comments made by Admin are:
copyrighted—all rights reserved; and, provided here for educational purposes only.

Jacks
Beneficiary
Beneficiary
Posts: 4
Joined: Friday August 12th, 2005 5:37 pm MDT

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Jacks » Tuesday January 22nd, 2013 4:45 pm MST

The failure of the A.G. to give his Notice and release Zane to prosecute this Quo Warranto before the swearing in ceremony is not surprising, so now what to do? My earlier question about the A.G. being subject to a Quo Warranto is more related to his failure to release Zane to prosecute, than for not prosecuting it himself. Is his failure to give Notice of his intent not to prosecute the Quo Warranto himself not a failure to do an essential duty of his Office?

Admin wrote:Again, the most important thing is the people must begin to study the Quo Warranto right thoroughly so they can timely and lawfully apply it. Also, again, these actions need the support of the people in mass. Thus, it is critical that the people continue to support the process all over the nation, in every federal judicial district.
I agree that the people in mass must believe in and act on the need to learn the law and apply it correctly, or else the nation suffers the consequences of our failure to do so, as Admin eloquently stated. Many people I talk to agree that Obama is not legally eligible for the Office of President. However, they lack belief that any action can be successful against the level of corruption, complicity, legal resources, and financial resources that have been used to cover the legal facts so far, and are numb to the point of being resigned to the current path of the nation and hoping it won't be too bad in the end.

Would a single successful Quo Warranto action against a Congressman for failure to do his duty to verify the eligibility of the President Elect for office be enough for the masses to awaken?

I think it would!

In the process of prosecuting the action against the Congressman, the truth of the definition of "natural born citizen" would have to be recognized by the courts, as this would be elemental to the case. Once this definition is more well known and understood, especially after it has been further established by another court case, the confidence in the law and awareness of the law will be greatly improved. And people will be outraged to realize the results of the failure to understand this definition, and will take proper action to remedy the error. Zane's Quo Warranto action is also elemental to the case and its nature and timeliness would be recognized.

Perhaps one action like this is akin to the Israelites who doubted at first, but then saw their friends healed from the snake bites by looking on Moses' staff and then decided to look themselves and also be healed.

I agree with Zane that one action can make a difference, and start a mass awakening.

Now, there are other failures of Congress that I wonder about being grounds for Quo Warranto action, like failure of the Senate to pass a budget for years? I believe the Senate is way past their required time to pass a budget. Perhaps, in addition to answering why he did not check the eligibility of the President Elect for office, Sen. Reid should answer in a Quo Warranto case why he has not recently let the House budget proposals be discussed in the Senate nor proposed one in the Senate?

Still believing the law will prevail and Zane's case will get its hearing in the courts,

Jacks

User avatar
Admin
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1574
Joined: Thursday June 9th, 2005 12:16 pm MDT

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Admin » Wednesday January 23rd, 2013 5:20 pm MST

:h: Jacks:
Regarding your last point first:
We believe that going after all of the other potential issues one might hold a member of Congress accountable for would be a significant error; because, it would move the focus off of the most important matter and that matter alone has the power to remove errant officials from office.

With that matter resolved, we will now address your post from top to bottom; as follows:
Other than the allegation that the Attorney General (hereinafter “AG”) can be held accountable for not processing forward Zane’s Quo Warranto action, we have to agree with the contents of your post. In in the District of Columbia where Corp. U.S. can, and has, statutized the Quo Warranto write to compel the AG to timely act would require a court action; which action is only now reasonable to bring and the outcome of such an action held in said district remains dubious at best (meaning that it is not likely worthy of the overt cost considering all of the other means for accomplishing the same thing.

The fact that Zane instigated the action is enough to establish several points.
  1. Someone of the people wants the action brought.
  2. The supportive letters, e-mail and phone calls that were made to members of Congress and the AG’s Office; support that desire from the people that were aware of the action (in the thousands); and,
  3. At least those respective members of Congress that received such contact knew or should have known that they were required by law to vet the issue of Obama’s candidacy but the knowingly failed so to do.
Respectively, that sets up stage two of the project “Call to Action”; which is, now the people need to hold those members of Congress accountable for that failure. Accordingly, the proper action in law for the people to take to address such an issue is, again: Quo Warranto. Only, this time, the proper place for the people to bring such actions is in the specific federal judicial district each of those members of Congress represent; and, the beauty of those actions is, they are filed in accord with the local court rules and laws of the State from which the action was generated. Respectively, the AG does not have the latitude he had in the case against Obama.

However, we also do not agree that the people can wait around for any one party to bring such an action. We simply do not have that kind of time to be accountable. Respectively, we believe that every person that sent letters to their Congressional representatives need to quickly learn the relevant laws necessary to proceed with such actions and then file the same.

Also, though we recognize the many followers of Moses that saw those that looked upon the snake on Moses raised staff and were healed followed that path to also look upon the staff and they were healed also, far too many others were determined that the required task (looking upon the so mounted serpent) was too easy to work; so, they refused to so look because they wanted to prove that was not the cause of the healing—of course, all of those that did not so look were proven correct by their respective deaths—so looking did not heal them, only because they refused to take the required action.

So it is in our time. Team Law is not the source of the law, we merely help people learn how to learn the law so they can apply it. However, the only reason the law sometimes fails to work today is the people have failed to learn and apply it. For the last well over 18 years Team Law has continually proven that the law works when it is properly learned and applied. By properly bringing Quo Warranto actions our Trustee was successful in securing the removal of two judges from the bench in Colorado. Others have had similar successes; yet, because the people are ignorant of both their rights and the laws at their disposal (if they would simply learn them and apply them), they fail to take appropriate action.

The result is what we see happening in our nation today. Nonetheless, we too know that the people can yet prevail; however, that will only happen as the people refuse to remain ignorant and respectively helpless. It is a simple matter of changing how you think about your future and your possibilities. Of course, that is exactly why we started our Success Network. It is also why we supported Zane’s “Call to Action”.

Respectively, it was not just the single actions taken by people like Enoch, Moses, Christ or Ghandi (or even Genghis Khan, Tamerlane, Hitler or Obama that changed the world, it was the combined actions of those that followed those leaders; whether their leadership was based upon tyranny or righteousness.
Edmund Burke wrote:All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
So it is with us all.
However, we like to look to the Prophet Daniel’s interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream of the beast with the head of gold and the ten toes of iron and clay as it applies to our time and recognize the stone that was, without hands, carved out of the everlasting hills (the chain of mountains that circumnavigates the globe; of which the Rocky Mountains is part). It is well recognized that that stone is representative of the people awakening to their inherent rights as children of God and turning back to our Creator and His laws by learning them and applying them. Then, as that stone rolls forth, it grows in mass and size gathering no moss like a snowball picking up speed as it rolls down hill. The stone continues to grow and increase its speed until it crashes into the beast, knocks it into the sea and the stone continues to grow until it fills the earth.

That is an awe inspiring vision.

Respectively, if we look at the alternatives before the people today; we can either:
  1. Choose to follow that vision and learn and apply God’s laws upon ourselves; which will compel us to take responsibility for the authority He gave us; from which we created our government and laws; respectively, that will compel us to apply the law to control the government and restore our Constitutional Republic. After all, isn’t that an elemental requirement of the first law man received: “Be fruitful and multiply, replenish and subdue”. The subdue part includes the fact that when we create something we are responsible to control it.
  2. Or, we can fool heartedly sit around grumbling about our blessings allow those around us instigate a civil war that is impossible to win and lose everything! We cannot comprehend why all of those that are taking the Corp. U.S. bait by buying up and storing arms and instigating rumors of secession cannot seem to see that that is exactly what Corp. U.S. wants!
There is no way to win such a war; the mere fact that you fight in it means you lost!

Thus, we must do all we can to help the world realize that if we don’t get together and solve the problems of our time using the primary weapons of good over evil—that the being:
  1. Righteousness acquired by living in accord with the laws of God; and,
  2. Apply the Law; meaning man’s law as it follows in accord with God’s law.
Respectively, the right of Quo Warranto, is the principle right the people have reserved to them to hold any officer accountable to the law.

As the people so awaken and properly apply the law, we will win our nation back.
Lest anyone forgets, this “Call to Action” in no way interferes with our work to support reseating our original jurisdiction government—in fact, it only enhances that work.

Respectively, each of us must continue to learn that law, spread the word and apply the law. Let’s help that stone roll forth!

We hope this information is helpful to you.
Tell everybody about Team Law! :t^:
Team Law,

"In memory of our God, our faith, and freedom,
and of our spouses, our children, and our peace.
"


As with all Forum posts, comments made by Admin are:
copyrighted—all rights reserved; and, provided here for educational purposes only.

Bigdog
Registered
Posts: 4
Joined: Sunday March 19th, 2006 4:54 pm MST

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Bigdog » Wednesday January 23rd, 2013 11:09 pm MST

I received a letter from Senator Dean Heller to day 23 Jan 2013, his letter dated 17 Jan 2013. I had sent him a letter on 010713, advising him of the Notice and Demand for a Writ of Quo Warranto (copy of same attached to my letter, of your sample cover letter). After checking your forum and finding that letters are being held up for two weeks for security checking before being forwarded to the Senator, I sent him an e-mail through his on line contact forum, to please have security rush him my letter as it is time sensitive, and contains important information. Don't use their e-mail form, use yours, as then you will have a copy of what you sent and when.

Anyway, I think he only received my e-mail, as his letter to me told me to check ‘The White House Blog’ and I could view Obama's long form birth certificate. So I did; I down loaded the pdf file. Point one, it's a shabby black and white production, two, there is no cert… number visible, three, there are no addresses, of parents, four no list of occupation's of parents , five, no listing of parents date and place of birth, six, no attending doctor's name, and seventh, there is no official's name and signature on the document. Now I looked at the short form birth certificate a while back and in my opinion it was a fake, trouble is I don't know where I filed it on my computer but I did look hard at it and used zoom to do so. Now when it comes to examination of documents I am not an expert, never the less I still think it is and was a fake.

Back to Dean Heller, the signature on the letter he sent looks different from the one on the face of the envelop that was sent, so I do not know whether or not he actually signed it, or some staffer used a name stamp. So I think he is nicely disregarding my attempt to inform him of his duty to do that duty to up hold the Constitution and the Law's as he is supposed to by his oath of office.

I also sent a letter to my Representative on 123012 the same as above and e-mailed him around Jan.15; but, have received no response. OK enough rambling for now lol. Bigdog

User avatar
Admin
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1574
Joined: Thursday June 9th, 2005 12:16 pm MDT

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Admin » Saturday January 26th, 2013 12:54 am MST

:h: Bigdog:
Please remember the issue at hand is not whether Obama was born in the United States; respectively, the only information from his published birth certificate is the nationality of Obama’s father. Of course, the birth certificate published on The White House Blog clearly provides that his father was born in Africa! Further, his father was never a United States citizen (naturalized or otherwise)—therefore, regardless of where he was born Obama cannot qualify for the office of President of the United States!

Respectively, that was the cause addressed in the Quo Warranto action Zane requested from the Attorney General (hereinafter “AG”).

Sure there is plenty of evidence that indicates a gigantic cover-up regarding where Obama was born; yet, that is not the point here. The relevant points here are:
  1. Obama’s father was clearly not a United States citizen; which is required for anyone to qualify for the office of the President of the United States;
  2. Zane timely, properly and lawfully filed a request for a Quo Warranto action with the AG.
  3. People from all over the country sent physical written letters, e-mailed messages and made phone calls to both the AG and to their respective members of Congress requesting support of the Quo Warranto and requesting that the members of Congress honor their constitutional requirement to vet that issue of Obama’s presidential candidacy.
  4. Respective of those notices, other similar messages each member of Congress has received (from other sources) and the Constitution’s explicit requirements, each member of Congress was clearly aware of their responsibility to vet the President Elect’s qualifications to hold the office of President of the United States;
  5. Congress failed to vet that issue regarding Obama.
  6. Wherefore, because each member of Congress failed to perform that constitutionally required responsibility, each member of Congress is subject to oustal from office in accord with properly brought Quo Warranto actions—if they are now brought.
Respectively, as we noted in our original “Call to Action” page, this is an action that will require participation from millions of people from around the country.

Forget the rumors and saber rattling of secession—secession can only lead to civil war.
Forget (for the moment) bothering about any other constitutionally secured right; because, by itself, this issue has the potential of returning our country back on track of our Constitutional Republic with all of our rights properly acknowledged and preserved.
Forget (for the moment) every other issue that gives cause for regard and —right Now—focus all of your effort and energy on this one issue—the people’s right to enforcement of the 9th Amendment secured lawful process of Quo Warranto. Learn it and then apply it—Team Law can help you do that.
Respectively, spread the word with everyone—on every forum—in every blog—by letter, e-mail and phone calls.

By now, it should be clear to anyone that has been reading or listening to the news or even just watching what’s going on around us all—Corp. U.S. wants a civil war—they want the people to rebel so they can quash the rebellion with martial law. Respectively, that is the one thing we cannot allow them to have.

Instead the people need to learn about the power of the Quo Warranto and start bringing those actions against the members of Congress that did not vet Obama’s candidacy as they are required to do by the Constitution.

We hope this information is helpful to you.
Tell everybody about Team Law! :t^:
Team Law,

"In memory of our God, our faith, and freedom,
and of our spouses, our children, and our peace.
"


As with all Forum posts, comments made by Admin are:
copyrighted—all rights reserved; and, provided here for educational purposes only.

Max
Beneficiary
Beneficiary
Posts: 24
Joined: Monday July 18th, 2005 12:30 pm MDT

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Max » Sunday March 10th, 2013 10:13 am MDT

I was just wondering. If Corp US can just go ahead and adopt the 16th amendment without proper ratification the way they did, then why couldn't they just do the same with their President. Why can't they install whoever they want, citizen or not? How would this situation be different thant them adopting the 16th amendment?

User avatar
Zane
Beneficiary
Beneficiary
Posts: 74
Joined: Wednesday February 4th, 2009 5:29 pm MST

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Zane » Monday March 11th, 2013 9:07 am MDT

Max,
The 16th Amendment didn't enlarge Corp U.S'. right to tax, it merely acknowledged, for all to see, their right to tax the entities which they create, like taxpayer trusts.

The Call to Action comes from a remedial right of the people to control their government (or the corporation representing it) already present in the Constitution for all to see and apply.

Bottom line— if the people are going to continue to lay around and do nothing about maintaining their constitutionally secured rights (etc.) while they add to the problem by contracting control to foreign corporations that pose as if they were our government, Corp US is going to continue to usurp power because it is in their nature to do so; as it is productive to their cause; which is to eliminate the effect of sovereignty in favor of an implied one world government.

Of course, if they can inspire the people to start a war against them, that will be the easiest way for Corp. U.S. to “Take everything, and give nothin’ back!”

Your silence is your consent!
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." (Hosea 4:6)

Wayne2195
Registered User
Registered User
Posts: 6
Joined: Wednesday December 22nd, 2010 11:32 am MST

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Wayne2195 » Monday March 11th, 2013 10:42 pm MDT

Zane,
The war has started, I've picked up my pen and put it to paper...
Don't be discouraged, you can't expect our current gov to follow the law!
They consider the constitution as an evolutionary document, It means whatever they want it to...
depends on the day and the weather!

Reagen started it with his drug wars. Now we have Afghanistan...
just another drug war,
take away their poppy plants and teach them how to grow GMO corn an soy...

God bless America...

User avatar
Zane
Beneficiary
Beneficiary
Posts: 74
Joined: Wednesday February 4th, 2009 5:29 pm MST

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Zane » Tuesday March 12th, 2013 10:27 am MDT

Wayne2195,
The war, as you put it, has been going on since long before you and I were born. Nowadays, some dilusional people think they are going to pick up their hunting rifles and defeat Corp U.S. in a combat situation. They think this because they are ignorant of how to properly take back what is ours and ignorance is the key to fear and failure. Failure is exactly what those who inspire war will receive if they accomplish their blind goal.

I disagree about Reagan, he was just another puppet in a long line of puppets. A proper study in history will reveal that Woodrow Wilson and his administration were the start of the TAKEOVER in 1917 and FDR finalized it with the Bretton Woods Agreement in 1944 when he gave the United States (corporate) treasury to the IMF. Did they allow these things intentionally or through ignorance and incompetance?

Of course, none of that has anything to do with our actual original jurisdiction government; which, in accord with law, formed Corp. U.S. in 1871. Respectively, what you are referring to as "our government" isn't even a government, it's merely that corporation acting as it were the government, and today that corporation is owned and/or controlled by the IMF.

Personally, I think if a war does take place those involved will be responsible for the loss of our Republic and it's Constitution, when they quickly lose the battle, and will then themselves become the target of the People's frustrations. Again, that is just my opinion.

It seems like the people don't understand what the word "united" means anymore. It means everyone comes together for a specific purpose that will benefit everyone. It doesn't mean: some positve, hopefull people (least of the populace) will take an intelligent, civil approach to the problem by learning the law and applying it while trying to rally the rest of the "UNITED" together to make a multi million strong force of people who can't be ignored anymore by the "powers that be" while others (too ignorant to teach or too lazy to read or too negative to see the truth through their own blind hatred of "government") are trying to rally the hopeless (most of the populace) together for one final disappointment in a war they can't possibly win in a million years because, it wouldn't last a day!

You said "the Constitution means whatever they want it to" and that's because the people fail to do anything about it as we saw with the Quo Warranto action I started. Everything wrong with our nation today is a direct result of the ignorance and incompetance of the majority of the People to control (subdue) what they have created…Government.

The timely filed Quo Warranto against Obama would have worked like a silver bullet for the whole world to see—and it still can! The people simply need to get involved and spread the word. Because Congress failed to vet Obama's candidacy [as required by the Constitution] each member of Congress is now subject to a Quo Warranto challenge; because they failed to do what was constitutionally required of them in their office.

It's the People that are the problem, not the "government". When the People finally see the truth and unite for the cause that is presented right here at Team Law, right in front of the whole worlds face, all of the problems you can sit there and grumble about involving the "government" will disappear. Without one gunshot.

But, if you would like to see a bad situation go to the worst possible outcome imaginable…just start a war with them instead…

Me, I'm not going to be a part of the team that lost everything for everyone by helping to eliminate the one weapon that Corp U.S. and it's owner(s) fear most which is… the Republic and it's Constitution… with a united People enforcing it—i'm going to be one of the ones that actually learned how it works and do all I can to enforce it.

America Bless God!
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." (Hosea 4:6)

User avatar
Admin
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1574
Joined: Thursday June 9th, 2005 12:16 pm MDT

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Admin » Thursday March 14th, 2013 4:42 pm MDT

:h: Max, Wayne & Zane:
Because there were elements of the foregoing responses that each needed a comment from Admin, we will make each of those responses here in order of their above inquiry separated by a horizontal line as follows:
To Max:
We appreciate the fact that Max’s comment and questions regarding the 16th amendment presupposed a significant difference between Corp. U.S’. 16th amendment (passed by Congress July 2, 1909; adopted as if ratified February 3, 1913) and the original jurisdiction Constitutional Republic’s 16th Article of Amendment (passed by Congress: February 26, 1869; ratified February 3, 1870; and, which has the identical words as Corp. U.S’. 15[size=80]th amendment[/size]); because that is an important distinction to remember. Respectively, in 1913, when Corp. U.S. adopted its 16th amendment, they set a precedent for adopting amendments to their constitution by acknowledging the ratification of the respective State through the word of that State’s corporate congressmen; which practice was followed for their adoption of Corp. U.S’ 17th amendment as well. However, that process is a reasonable adaptation of the intent of their constitution (the “United States Constitution”) given that it was adopted in that exact same manner by its reference in their act of incorporation (the “District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871”).

Nonetheless, given that the original jurisdiction “Constitution for the United States of America”, which formed our Constitutional Republic, grants Congress the authority to pass (and enforce) any law within the 10 mile square of the District of Columbia, there is no legal or lawful problem with those actions; or with, the subsequent interpretation of what constitutes ratification by a corporate State with relation to the Corp. U.S. constitution. However, you must also notice that, given that understanding, such a ratification does, in fact, follow that pattern of acceptance and it does not simply allow ratification without such a State’s opportunity to challenge the same. In other words, if the Corporate State disagreed with the adopted ratification authorized by them through their Congressmen, they could have raised a contest to it and that ratification would not have been allowed. Nonetheless, over time no contest was ever raised by any of the alleged ratifying corporate states—and, the corporate amendment stands in their constitution.

Given that foundation to your inquiry, you then asked: “why couldn’t they just do the same with their President?” The simplest response to that is; because that is not allowed for in their Constitution. Again, their form of ratification of their 16th amendment is a reasonable interpretation of their constitution given that it was adopted by the original jurisdiction government in Corp. U.S’. incorporating document (District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871). However, even that Constitution (United States Constitution) absolutely requires the Corp. U.S. President must be a “natural born Citizen of the United States of America”.

Respectively, that answers your next question: “Why can't they install whoever they want, citizen or not?” There is no room for any other interpretation of that constitutionally set requirement. Further, the additional amendments that have been added to Corp. U.S’. constitution make it quite clear that Congress is required to vet the issue of their Corp. U.S. President Elect’s qualification for candidacy for the Office.

The bottom line: it is the responsibility of the people to know the law well enough to compel compliance of the people they put into office; whether that office be in: original jurisdiction, Corp. U.S. or the corporate state. And, that is the thing that is missing.

The people cannot expect either the government or the law to take care of itself. All authority in government (or in the agencies they form—like Corp. U.S.) comes from the people; and it is the responsibility of the people to both maintain their knowledge of the law and lawfully enforce the provisions they granted that allow the government (and its agencies to exist).

Of course, that is why Team Law was formed: we discovered that that required level of knowledge in the people was woefully lacking; accordingly, Team Law was formed to help the people learn how to learn the law so they could learn how to effectively apply the law to that end.

Max, et al, we hope that not only helps you understand the answers to your inquiry but also helps you understand your responsibility to learn and apply the law as well.
To Wayne:
As per the comment made by Wayne2195, though it may appear like Corp. U.S. and the powers that be (thereto related) may “consider the constitution as an evolutionary document,” that, “means whatever they want it to” depending “on the day and the weather”, it is not up to Corp. U.S. to learn (or create) the law and apply it. We believe the point Zane was making (to which your response was made) was that in the United States of America, the people are sovereign, not the government. When forming the government with the “Constitution for the United States of America”, the people [using their collective sovereignty] granted the government only the limited authority necessary to execute that (the peoples’) collective sovereign authority to do the things ordained by that Constitution; which authority was further limited by the “Constitution of the United States of America”. In law, the only degree to which that has, since that time, changed is Corp. U.S. was created by the “District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871” and after going bankrupt in 1933, they [through the Social Security Act of 1935] began offering the opportunity to participate with a Social Security cardholder as a contractually bound Corp. U.S. agent, statutorily controlled by that cardholding agency relationship.

Of course, though those things are that only difference between how our Constitutional Republic was created and how it is managed today, the effect of those differences changes the appearance of what the people perceive as “their government” from a Constitutional Republic to a Communistic Oligarchy controlled by foreign principles. And, still so many of the people remain ignorant; choosing not to learn the law, so they can use it to restore our nation; but, rather, following the pied piper (Corp. U.S. through its controlled media) to the gun store—so that, instead of learning the law and applying it to win our nation back they can participate in the killing that will come if they don’t repent, turn back to the law’s of God and our Constitutional Republic and restore our nation through the righteous application of the law.

The people need to remember that here, in the United States of America, the government does not possess the authority to control the people; rather, the people are required to govern themselves and if they commit a trespass (civil or criminal), then accountability to that trespass grants those against whom the trespass was made the trespasser’s authority to hold them (the trespasser) accountable for the trespass.

The bottom line: Wayne is right, the War has already started; but, it is not yet a conventional war fought with guns and other such devices of death and destruction; rather, it is a war for the hearts of men. Thus, you must first decide what kind of future you would like to have.

Would you like to live in a nation where all of your rights were respected and upheld in peace and prosperity; where you could freely live on your land in peace with your family and your property having the opportunity to be fruitful and multiply, replenish and subdue in accord with your lawful desires? If you would, you have to realize that kind of thing has its price; and, it is impossible to maintain such a life without knowing the law and remaining responsible to its author and source—our Creator. Thus, we are obligated to learn and apply the law to maintain that kind of freedom.

The good news is, we can still achieve that kind of life here in America. All we have to do is:
  1. Catch the vision;
  2. Share the vision with everyone you can inspiring them to also catch the vision;
  3. Ignore the naysayers helping them to understand that the only reason they are naysayers is because they have not done anything to make the vision our way of life;
  4. Learn the law; and,
  5. Apply the law.
Respectively, though the war has already started, each of us still have the means to determine the outcome. If today only the author of this post and Zane had caught that vision and from this post only one other person was so inspired and then the three of us each helped one more person to catch that vision, the power of that multiplication could easily, within a short period of time overwhelm those that yesterday could only see their vision of doom and gloom.

It is up to you!
You can dwell on what’s wrong and imagine destruction, all your beliefs and actions into the support of that destructive path and reap its benefits; or, you can imagine the future as you would like to have it and then start doing all you can to make that desirable future become our tomorrow. The choice is up to you. All things are truly possible to those that believe and you are the source of your beliefs.

That is exactly why Team Law formed our Success Network. The most important element of creating a desirable future is catching the vision of that future that drives you to do what you need to do to make that happen; and, that is not dependant on what others believe or desire. Then once you start to envision that desire, it is important to start acting accordingly. We can help with that too.

The situation we find ourselves in today was not created overnight; respectively, the remedy will also take time; but, the good news is, the remedy is up to you. It is also up to each and every one of us; learning the law and applying it will be a part of that remedy; and, it is OK that learning to learn and apply the law will take time.

This topical thread is about the ongoing “Call to Action”. therefore, if you have not read that page recently, you might want to go there and read the update that was posted last week. For now that is a good place to start learning all you can about the Quo Warranto process and how that process can be applied right now all over our country to help bring Corp. U.S. back under the control of law. People in the original jurisdiction government offices are also working to help the people unite to use the law to restore our Constitutional Republic; which will go a long way to making that vision of a desirable future an elemental part of each of our lives.
To Zane:
That last segment went a long way to also addressing the points we wanted to regarding Zane’s posts. We cannot express enough the fondness we have for Zane due to the study and work he has applied to step up and do what no one else had done—that being, to timely file a request for a Quo Warranto action against the President Elect Obama. And, though that action could have, with enough support from the people, ended the reign of B. Obama, it still remains a pivotal piece of the solution required to remedy the errors of Corp. U.S.; because, the peoples’ response to that action gave notice to every congressman of their constitutionally required responsibility to vet the President Elect’s qualifications for that office before they confirmed the election’s results and authorized the reseating of that President Elect. Of course, their failure to so vet that issue makes them each subject to the Quo Warranto remedy that asks: “Did you fail to do anything you were required to do in your office as a Congressman?”

Because the answer to that question is: “Yes”, Quo Warranto applies and oustal from office is the only remedy. The beauty of the power of that contest is that no one can lawfully stop such an action other than the person that raises the contest. It is not stopped by the Attorney General simply because he chooses not to respond. Outside of the District of Columbia, he has no option other than to accept the cause of action or deny it. If he either chooses not to take the case or fails to timely respond, then the party that raises the action can accept the automatic placement as an independent prosecutor for the Attorney General’s office with the full authority of that office. Respectively, the judge in such an action also has no ability to determine what the punishment shall be; rather, if the answer is, “Yes”, the actor is removed from the office.

Respectively, it is important to remember why one might want to raise such a contest. Remember, the people have raised many cases against Obama contesting his qualifications for the office of Corp. U.S’. President; however, each of those actions failed. Thus, we must ask if there may be a lawful reason why each of those cases failed. The answer to that question is, again: “Yes.” If for no other reason, the only place the Constitution allows for jurisdiction to challenge either that President’s office or anyone serving in that office is in Impeachment proceedings in the United States Senate. Accordingly, because no such proceedings have been brought, that office (and the party seated in it) is, and remains, outside the jurisdiction of any other court or venue—thus, all prior court actions failed to acquire jurisdiction for at least that cause.

The only other place or time for so contesting anyone with relation to their qualifications for serving in that office is between the time of election of a party into the office of President Elect and the time of that party’s being seated in the office of President.

Also, the Senate has the constitutionally set mandate to vet the President Elect’s candidacy as well as the opportunity to verify the propriety and outcome of the President’s election; and, though they did verify and approve the outcome of the election, they failed to vet the qualification of the candidate. At that point the people have the opportunity to hold Congress accountable for that failure through the process of Quo Warranto. The beauty of that fact is that Congress already knows (or should know) that they should have impeached Obama long ago for cause; but, they have not; so, we expect the first thing the new Senate will do is impeach Obama; if not, the people can continue to remove Senator’s until the Senate does the job.

Maintaining the effectiveness of the constitution is really just that simple. However, with an ignorant unwilling people, such a process is difficult to manage. Wherefore, education is the key. The people need to be inspired to catch a vision of the future they desire then try to imagine maintaining such a future in ignorance and absent the ability to know the law and apply it. You should quickly discover it is impossible to imagine a future where you have control of the law and yet do not know what the law is or how to control the same. The bottom line: learning and applying the law is an elemental part of maintaining freedom in any of its possible aspects.

Thus, our job is to inspire people to catch the vision of a desirable future; of course, that is best done by first securing such a vision of the future and then living like that is the only option as you both work for that future and help others to also catch the vision.

I am reminded of the lyrics of an old song from the 40’s: “You’ve got to accentuate the positive; eliminate the negative, latch on to the affirmative; and, don’t mess with Mister In-Between”. Though that song was written in the post depression war times of WWII; it remained popular right into the 60’s and it remains a favorite of many people today. It would go well with us today if it were resurrected as a source of hope and model for restoring our nation.

Zane, you were right; whatever happens to our nation and its people will not be the effect of either the government or Corp. U.S. and its minions; however, it will be the effect of what the people do and how they proceed. Last Sunday, I was speaking with a very intelligent woman well versed in both the marketing promoted by the Corp. U.S. and the anti government rhetoric of the internet protestors. Though she was quite opinionated and passionately firm in her lack of faith in the people’s willingness to either learn the law or apply it; she was equally firm in her plans of how she was going to remain prepared for the future of her preconceived gloom and doom. My input in the conversation was slight; but, in my moment, I shared my view of the possibilities. At first, she simply rejected my vision; because she was not able to see past her own. Then, I shared the necessity for learning the law; so, we can apply it. She rejected that too; because, again, her image of the future application of the law was not a possibility—thus, it was a waste of her time. I then asked her what if she could imagine a future filled with the desires of her heart. She could, so I asked her, “If you could change anything in your life that would insure that you could have that future you desire, what would that be?” She answered. Then I asked her, “Would you be willing to let me do all I can to help you acquire that future and make sure that you achieve it?”

Now, I am not going to follow the outcome of that conversation here; other than to note that even though she was totally unwilling to imagine a powerful positive future for America until I changed the focus to the successes she desires for her family as she opened her heart to imagine just that powerful positive future. At that point we were able to point her to the Success Network where we can so help anyone achieve that vision and respectively help them to save the nation by changing their focus.

Respectively, as I reviewed your last post, I could feel your pain in watching so many people as they are deceived into following the pied piper into war with Corp. U.S.; when that is actually the furthest thing from their actual desires. However, as long as they are so focused, it is difficult for them to imagine what they truly desire. Thus they may not believe your effort to rally the people to support the path to use the law to restore our nation; as you began with your Quo Warranto action.

However, we can easily see the possibilities of your continuing on the path you began by following it through until you have accomplished your desired outcome. We can also see more people so inspired to support your path as they begin to realize what they have done to support the outcomes they desire vs. what they have done to support the outcomes they do not desire.

The bottom line: as I was talking to the woman noted above, at first, all she could imagine was the doom and gloom of war and destruction as the only thing she could see. However, after we changed the focus to a powerful positive future and helped her realize that she could see that as well as the things she could do (and with which we could help) then she could see that her effort did not depend on other’s mindsets. In fact, the scripture is right—all things are possible to those that believe!

The question are:
  1. Are you willing to venture that focus on possibilities you can control or are you only willing to focus on the mind numbing outcome of others and their media?
  2. On what are you willing to focus the energy of your beliefs?
  3. What if you could imagine a future filled with the desires of your heart?
      If you could change anything in your life that would insure that you could have that future you desire, what would that be?
  4. Would you be willing to let us do all we can to help you acquire that future and make sure that you achieve it?
If reviewing those questions actually helps open your heart to the possibilities please understand that all it takes today is for you to imagine the possibilities.

For any of you reading this post that have not already participated in the Success Network, please let that path be of help to you even if you are not yet ready to support the Quo Warranto path. Then, understand the power of networking a mindset of positive change for a brighter future regardless of what else we all accomplish together.

We hope this information is helpful to you.
Tell everybody about Team Law! :t^:
Team Law,

"In memory of our God, our faith, and freedom,
and of our spouses, our children, and our peace.
"


As with all Forum posts, comments made by Admin are:
copyrighted—all rights reserved; and, provided here for educational purposes only.

User avatar
Tplane37
Beneficiary
Beneficiary
Posts: 7
Joined: Sunday August 5th, 2012 10:07 pm MDT

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Tplane37 » Friday May 3rd, 2013 7:42 am MDT

What is the current status of Zane's Quo Warranto Action? In the posts above, there is an implication that the Quo Warranto against President Elect Obama can no longer occur in the Courts on grounds that he has already been sworn into Corp. U.S. Office as President; however said action is now to occur before the Corp. U.S. Senate; is my understanding as expressed correct?
:h: Inserted by Admin:
Red italicized text (like this), in this post, was inserted by Admin.
The answer to your question is: “No. Your understanding is not correct. The Senate cannot hear a Quo Warranto action.”

What can the People of this nation do at this point to aide Zane in moving forward, as his action is the only one I am aware of that was timely filed (I cannot personally state that it was "properly filed" because I do not feel I have completed enough research on the Writ to make such a statement, but it would appear that it may have also been properly filed)? It is my understanding that Zane must now compel the Corp. U.S. Senate to bring an impeachment action against Obama; but isn't that a different action than the Quo Warranto action? Or is it merely another subset of said Writ in this matter?
They are separate actions. We suggest that you go back and read the initial “Call to Action” post again—because it gets updated every time there is more to note on that topic. Respectively, things changed quite a lot when Obama took the seat for his second term.
It would appear from the above posts and conversation on the subject matter, that the People must now force the Senate to do their job and impeach Obama for unlawfully holding the Office of President for the Corp. U.S. in direct violation to the Corp. U.S. Constitution (which in this matter, also reflects the requirements in the Republic's Constitution as well; in regard to being a natural born citizen... but our nation's Constitution is not at bar here (nothing is), the support for this action is grounded in the Corp. U.S. laws). And in the event that each State's Senators fail to bring such an action, the electors in each Senator's district are permitted to rightfully bring Quo Warranto Actions in their respective Federal District Courts accord with their Corp. State Laws? It is at this point, I become confused.

First, are we solely focusing on the Corp. U.S. and Corp. State laws, regulations, rules, and codes? Or can we find support in the original jurisdiction laws as well? Being that we are dealing with Corp. U.S. Officers in this instance, are the electors required to hold 50 acres of patent secured land (e.g. said elector has completed all necessary elements of the Land Patent Sandwich); or are the electors in this instance to be "voters" registered with the Corp. State they are bringing the Quo Warranto Action in?
Though the right to Quo Warranto is a natural law right that exists in original jurisdiction government as well, these quo warranto actions have nothing to do with our original jurisdiction government.
I have several more questions in this regard, but many of them will require Team Law Beneficiary Support, or rely on answers to questions that required the same. However, the biggest question at this point is: Where can one research the process, background, and other elements of Quo Warranto? I have attempted to find case law on the Writ in Illinois and in Ohio to no avail. Ohio has an online tool available on their Supreme Court website that allows you to search terms from within decisions from their Appellate and Supreme Courts, yet even with the broadest of searches, I come up empty handed when searching for "Quo Warranto." Where else can one find these decisions that seem as if they are "unpublished?"
That level of support is reserved to Team Law beneficiary support. :t^:

User avatar
Zane
Beneficiary
Beneficiary
Posts: 74
Joined: Wednesday February 4th, 2009 5:29 pm MST

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Zane » Friday May 3rd, 2013 8:24 am MDT

Tplane37,
At this point, the Quo Warranto against Obama is moot, however, it is now up to the People from every state, of every congressional district, regardless of their voter status, to bring Quo Warranto actions against their congressmen (one Representative & two Senators) for not vetting the issue of Obama's candidacy as the Constitution required of them. Quo Warranto is a remedial right of the People secured by the Constitution (see: Call to Action!).

This is the remedy for the usurpation caused by Obama's presidency. If the People don't stand up and demand the Senate do their job, who will? Obviously, the Senate has not fulfilled that obligation; given the fact that thousands of letters were sent to them appraising them of the Quo Warranto action I brought against Obama.

Bottom line, it is entirely in the hands of the People from every voting district from every state to bring Quo Warranto actions according to their state's laws in the Federal District Courts in their states against their state's 2 senators.
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." (Hosea 4:6)

User avatar
Tplane37
Beneficiary
Beneficiary
Posts: 7
Joined: Sunday August 5th, 2012 10:07 pm MDT

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Tplane37 » Friday May 3rd, 2013 9:24 am MDT

Thank you for the clarification. Are there sources that we can refer the People to so that they may educate themselves on how to proceed with Quo Warranto against their Senators? If I recall correctly, Team Law's Trustee requested that copies of the letters sent to the Senators by the People be sent to him for documentation purposes. How should one proceed in obtaining copies of material evidence that a specific Senator was made aware of Mr. Obama's ineligibility on grounds of not being a natural born citizen?
:h: Inserted by Admin:
Please go and read the entire article located at “Call to Action
:t^:
The point of the matter is that in this day and age, it is very difficult to find people that are actually willing to do the work to educate themselves on a specific topic. As has been said in the book The Slight Edge, "It's easy to do, but its also easy not to do." Most people in today's society are going to take the later route, because it's easier for them to do nothing than to put forth the effort to do what is right and proper. And further, many people today fear the Corp. U.S. and challenging any "governmental authority" (of which we are aware that the Corp. U.S./States are not our "government," but most are currently unwilling or unable to recognize that fact). Therefore, in order to convince others that such an action (Quo Warranto) is necessary, proper, and rightful, I believe that we must also be able to demonstrate documented factual evidence to support the same. I am sure that such research has been done prior to bringing the now-moot Quo Warranto Action against former President-Elect Obama, reviewing your Notice and Demand only shows that such a right exists and that a mind knowledgeable in the workings of the Law knows that such a Writ can and should issue. But the sad fact of the matter remains: the general populous in this country are ignorant of the law and of the rights and powers that each of the People possess; and are further ignorant of how to apply the Law and how to properly exercise their rights and powers. This latter fact is one that Team Law continues to work diligently at remedying, however, I am not certain that such a wide and diverse populous can be educated on how to educate themselves fast enough to have a noticeable impact on the current Presidential Term; especially fast enough to prevent further damage to our People's mindset and tolerance of tyranny. What can we do to "speed up" the learning process for this particular action?

User avatar
Zane
Beneficiary
Beneficiary
Posts: 74
Joined: Wednesday February 4th, 2009 5:29 pm MST

Comments re: “Call to Action” Phase 2

Postby Zane » Saturday May 4th, 2013 9:03 am MDT

Tplane37,
The best evidence one could have regarding a particular Senator's knowledge of the Quo Warranto against Obama is the letter they sent to that senator. The fact that Congress and the Attorney General received thousands of those letters makes it blatantly obvious that they knew or should have known.

You're right about the fact that Corp US and the Corp States are not the problem here, it's the lack of knowledge of the people that makes all of the tyranny possible.

As far as "speeding up the learning process of the people” the more people like you and me become interested in the topic(s) we are discussing here, the faster the ball will roll. Quo warranto, like the land patent, is a powerful tool the people have to keep their government and its corporation(s) under control (which we are a long way from now).

People are bombarded with Corp US television everyday when they watch the news.
But, what if they had a whole new perspective on those subjects presented to them for their consideration instead of just Corp state television they also have a resource they can turn to for the actual facts as stated in the law where it's easy to find? It's often very hard to find what you are looking for to support your cause when you are looking through law books, court cases, statutes, codes, registers, Acts, etc.

Eliminating the frustrating mess called “researching the law” would make great strides toward motivating the people to action. I think Team Law’s “online resources” is providing this service now and can only get better with more involvement from the people.

Some sites for researching law are way to expensive for me and I am not willing to pay the price for it so I have to use what is available. Sometimes that means hours and hours of researching just to find one court case site that backs up what I am doing in a particular action. As I get better at learning how to find laws from experience, that time spent gets shorter and shorter along with my dependency on others to do it for me. It would be nice if that court case was just available here on Team Law because someone found it and listed it, kind of like Tyler Durden’s topic on Corp State formations where someone from the States found and listed the action their State used in forming their corporation to deal in Fed Notes. Now that information is available here without the hassle and frustration of finding it in the law. Of course, then we would have people who know the law but, are unable to find it for themselves if that source became unavailable to them. We must wait for necessity to present itself then, the solution will unfold. You can’t fight a grease fire with water and, we can’t fight the laws here with guns.

There are a few topics affecting everyone equally which keep our nation oppressed by foreigners. Number one being the man's relationship to the taxpayer created by the Social Security Administration, acquiring and controlling the use of land and any property on the land, the marriage license law, driver license law and the lack of knowledge of the special remedial writs like quo warranto, mandamus, habeas corpus, etc.
If only a million people here were proficient at securing those 5 things our nation would be much different already. When the rest of the people catch on…
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." (Hosea 4:6)

User avatar
Admin
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1574
Joined: Thursday June 9th, 2005 12:16 pm MDT

Introducing: “Call to Action” Phase 3

Postby Admin » Wednesday July 24th, 2013 9:29 am MDT

:h: To all:
On, May 4, 2013 10:03 am, the last response to this file was made and this topic was locked because the “Call to Action” Phase 2, became moot on January 20, 2013; when President Obama was certified as the winning candidate for the 2012 Election.

Thus, further responses to this topic regarding Phase 2, were made moot at that time.

However, the Call to Action does not end there. Just as Phase 1 was completed by Zane Grey filing his request for a Quo Warranto action followed by the Attorney General failing to proceed upon it, Phase 2 was completed when, on, January 20, 2013, President Obama was again seated as President (for his second term in office). Thus, the “Call to Action”simply moves on to Phase 3—Charging Congress.

The bottom line: the point of Zane’s action was to follow the law to bring the issue of Barrack Obama’s ineligibility to bear. Respectively, the only time, place and venue designated for the people to challenge a seated President of the United States’ candidacy for re-election is by a Quo Warranto action brought between Election Day (after that President becomes the new President Elect) and seating day, January 20th (almost 3 months later). After that window closes, only a Senatorial Impeachment can get the job done.

Respectively, Zane followed his course because no one else had done it yet, in accord with the law.

The law requires that the only way the propriety of a seated President of the United States’ office can be challenged is through impeachment. However, because:
  1. It should be clear enough that Congress has not vetted the issue of President Obama’s lack of standing as one that is not a natural born Citizen; because his father was not a citizen of the United States; and,
  2. The fact that the Corp. U.S. Senate has not yet impeached him for nearly five years indicates that they have no intention of doing that without being compelled.
Respectively, it should be obvious that Congress needs to get a bit of inspiration—from the people—to bring on the impeachment for the cause that Obama never qualified for the office in either the first or second Election.

Finally, because the Constitution mandates Congress’ responsibility not only for counting the Electoral College’s votes for a President Elect to verify who won the election, by receiving the majority of the votes, they are also required to verify that the President Elect qualifies for the office in all other ways as well. However, because they failed to do that, even after receiving thousands of letters, etc., they too are each now subject to the effects of Quo Warranto actions brought by the people. Thus, “Phase 3” is on.

We hope this information is helpful to you.
Tell everybody about Team Law! :t^:
Team Law,

"In memory of our God, our faith, and freedom,
and of our spouses, our children, and our peace.
"


As with all Forum posts, comments made by Admin are:
copyrighted—all rights reserved; and, provided here for educational purposes only.


Return to “Call to Action!”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests